Judicialization of Health in Brazil:

Categorization of decision-making stages by the Supreme Federal Court and the impacts on the Unified Health System

Authors

  • Jarbas Ricardo Almeida Cunha Universidade de Brasília, Brasil
  • Ana Cláudia Farranha Grupo de Estudos Observatório de Políticas Públicas, Centro de Estudos Avançados de Governo e Administração Pública, Faculdade de Direito, Universidade de Brasília, Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33167/2184-0644.CPP2021.VVIIN1/pp.15-35

Keywords:

Judicialization of Health, Supreme Federal Court, Right to Health, Public Health Policy

Abstract

This article intends to analyze the decision-making stages of the judicialization of public health policy in Brazil by the highest legal court in the country — the Supreme Federal Court of Justice (STF). Subsequently, we present the most relevant criticisms of the excessive judicialization of health, attempting, to list alternatives in order to discuss a possible program of improvements for public health policy, having as its main element the dialogue between the Brazilian Justice and Health Systems. The methodology used can be characterized as quali-quantitative, considering that data collection was used on the STF website for research and analysis of judicial decisions, as well as a biographically doctrinaire review.

Published

2022-08-11

How to Cite

Cunha, J. R. A., & Farranha, A. C. (2022). Judicialization of Health in Brazil:: Categorization of decision-making stages by the Supreme Federal Court and the impacts on the Unified Health System. Public Sciences & Policies, 7(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.33167/2184-0644.CPP2021.VVIIN1/pp.15-35

Issue

Section

Articles